|

|
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|

|
The Threat
Assessment Process
This page addresses the basic framework
needed to conduct a threat assessment utilizing PETRA
Procedures to determine the
degree of risk and appropriate response based on
individual risk factors and psychosocial functioning to help prevent repeat threatening
behavior.
|
|
Threat Risk
Assessment.
|
|
Psychosocial Evaluation.
|
|
Threat Response.
|
|
PETRA
follow up.
|
|
|
 |
Overview:
Threat
assessment is a useful tool in minimizing the
frequency of school violence. The technique
involves a five step process beginning with a receipt of
a threat by administrative personnel, who then
begin to gather relevant information regarding the
incident. Level two is marked by a formal threat assessment
by personnel specifically trained for this task.
The third step involves conducting a psychosocial
evaluation. The fourth step involves implementing
protective interventions which may include
discipline as well as therapeutic efforts. The
final step is to document all actions taken and
schedule follow up to check on the fidelity and
efficacy of the interventions that were put in
place (more
about the threat assessment process).
|
|
|
|
Threat
Risk Assessment.
Threats may be (a) direct or indirect, (b)
specific and detailed or general, (c) well thought
out or impulsive, and/or (d) veiled, conditional,
or implied. Inherent in all threats is an express
intent to harm. An instrument such as the
Adolescent and Child Urgent Threat Evaluation, or
ACUTE is very helpful in structuring your threat
assessment efforts. (more). |
|
|
|
Psychosocial
Evaluation. Many
of the personality characteristics identified in
the literature regarding perpetrators of school
violence reflect significant maladaptive emotional
and/or behavioral characteristics that cluster in
the domains of depression, aggression, alienation,
and egocentrism, the ecology of the home and
school, and resilience characteristics such as
coping and stress. Use of a psychosocial
evaluation, such as the PETRA or other
psychosocial measure is necessary to accurately
identify problematic functioning in these domains.
(more) |
|
|
|
Threat Response.
A threat of violence should be
considered a cry for help. It is important to address
the underlying problem that lead to the threat of
violence to keep it from escalating due to a lack of
appropriate intervention. Effective administrative response must balance the need for
appropriate discipline and the implementation of
individualized interventions addressing the issues
that lead to the threat, a student
safety plan is good place to start (more). |
|
|
|
Follow up & Monitoring.
Thorough
threat assessment procedures will yield important
information regarding the nature of the threat,
level of risk, and underlying social emotional
difficulties. It is important to use this
information to guide immediate action and implement
targeted interventions in a timely to ensure the
present and future safety of everyone on the
school campus. A PETRA (psychosocial
evaluation & threat assessment) report
template in MS Word form is provided at the right.
Comments & suggestions to
improve this document are welcomed.
|
Psychological Insight ©
2006
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| |
school
violence home | psychosocial
evaluation | threat assessment
about us |
petra info | e-mail
|
|
|
|